Assuming that
global climate change is a reality, but is
not caused by human activity and the reasons propounded, then cynically trading a
carbon footprint with less technologically advanced countries further disadvantages competitors
taken in by the lack of logic, but seriously trying to reduce
CO2 emissions. This attempts to
kill the opposition, by ensuring resources are spent on
'doing the right thing' and
not making a
profit.
This is politically motivated. Scientists are served with
death threats [by
Fostering the
Ethic of
Antiterrorist
Rule
(FEAR Services)] if they don't toe the
correct line. Remember science is funded and the paymasters
(governments) direct who gets paid:
if they behave. That (allegorical) financial stick that is used in the attempt to beat up, silence and subjugate any living creature that constitutes opposition.
This can theoretically amount to a small panel of individuals acting as a group so controlling global outcomes
But there's
nothing new in that, it happens all the time and it's known as:
'bringing pressure to bear'
Notably, the
IPCC makes no mention of how
BIG or
small it is as an 'organisation'. Grandiose names like
UNEP and
WMO are by association and only
suggest that the
IPCC is very important. The connection with
Gore and the
Nobel Peace Award also creates the illusion of importance. Rather like the mediaeval days of being burnt at the stake if you dared criticise the church. Not only has Gore been linked to this once admired
Nobel name, but now also
US President Obama.
Shamed once then
shamed again within
two years by political inveigling. Obama has only been in office for one of those years, but is already afforded a prize for an unmeasurable future (hope) that has been earned by the many for a lifetime's contribution in seriously important and measurable done deeds. This supports and creates the illusion of
'urgency', but still talk is of anything between
2020 - 2050. The global public conditioning shows how weak the position really is and the dangerous propagandist pomposity of convincing the world that spending to save the planet is the only way. To
save the planet. Meanwhile funding and promoting wars so
destroying the planet and its inhabitants. Governments around the world
will not even agree to anything so the
gambit is
already lost. Few are making serious attempts at saving the planet. The
Copenhagen bash illustrates this perfectly. But it won't stop the attempts to subvert opinion away from
truth and support the
lie.
For all their apparent collective wisdom, nowhere does the obvious fact that water has always been totally recyclable until mankind started to build with bricks, mortar, cement and concrete. Water is locked up forever within these materials and can
NEVER be recovered. Once it has been used that's it.
Gone. This is the
elephant in the room: so obvious it's just ignored. Or simply not realised. Not understood. It's very worrying that for all their self-congratulation in being awarded the
Nobel Peace Prize (why!!!) they don't recognise the basic facts.
Water is critical to climate though the continual recycling from the start
cannot continue once it has been irreversibly
'destroyed'.
Drinking water or
potable water to support life is around
2% of a
global resource. All the oceans are salt-containing and are therefore unusable. It cannot be used in the manufacture of cement and concrete so drinking water is consumed without a thought. So, all the posturing and hand wringing is a complete
sham. But, of course,
desalination will be one of the next
buzz words to be put inside the
money machine, alongside such terms as
climate change and
global warming.
Saving the planet? Sounds a very laudable goal. If true. But it's not. It's about the
parasite (governments) screwing more money out of the host
(global population). It's one plausible explanation as to why the
growth in the population is
encouraged to increase.
Gender Selection
Buying opportunity to pump out more greenhouse gases. The whole idea of a
carbon offset is a
con rather like the
Apollo hoax . The groundswell is gathering momentum in the rejection of the alleged 'landings'. The carbon offset argument that is unbelievably crude only attempts to suppress and so control Third World countries trying to raise their life standard and prosperity. If one country (like an individual) were to get rich then another must get poorer.
The rich not only want to stay rich...
but get richer.
Who gets hurt? They don't care as long as their wealth and power only increase.
It's a disease
It's somewhat similar to what used to be a no smoking area in a restaurant. Smoke drifts. It's no good stating that there is a no smoking area when the smoke cannot be controlled. Same with carbon dioxide. It drifts. It cannot be controlled by stating that a 'fine' has been paid.
It's all about raising money justified as
'taxation' on the back of a natural phenomenon.
Earth's precession orbit around a star that is getting hotter.
But placing
a tax on the humble
Sun could encourage it to cool down. Placed against the
oversized human ego, the
Sun is so
hopelessly tiny. This obvious paradox exemplifies the ludicrous state of affairs with human belief and credulousness. Planet Earth would obviously straighten itself up, too. Up against such terrible odds as the
human ego, the planet and star would quiver in their collectively
anthropomorphic (hypothetical) boots.
Or even change orbit in an attempt to escape the grip of
human stupidity. The Earth and Sun could never hope to survive.
The
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is doing a
2009 World Tour (probably
not using any bicycles or canoes) demonstrating the self-importance of this gang. Extracting colossal finance-support to simply exist. Human belief is so
weak and gullible that it quite happily stumps up the money
without question and just complete and pure acceptance.
Transport
Pollution
21-23 January: Amsterdam, Netherlands
29 January: Sao Paulo, Brazil
23-25 February: Hayama, Japan
3-6 March: Honolulu, Hawaii
18-20 March: Oslo, Norway
23-26 March: Oslo, Norway
20 April: Antalya, Turkey
5-7 May: Sao Paulo, Brazil
22-26 June: Santiago, Chile
13-17 July: Venice, Italy
30-31 August: Oslo, Norway
1-4 Sept: Oslo, Norway
14-16 Sept: Geneva, Switzerland
17-18 Sept: Geneva, Switzerland
26-29 October: Bali, Indonesia
9-12 November: unspecified
16-18 (am) November: Geneva, Switzerland
18 (pm)-20 November: Geneva, Switzerland
