Nuclear Power To All Except Iran

Iran is sitting on oil and has

no need for nuclear power

Such was the gist of a comment made by Francis Maude, MP on BBC's Question Time (25th October 2007). A mistake? The hypocrisy in any nuclear stance is nonetheless made very clear. The responsible nations can wield the big stick over other less-developed nations keeping their progress back. The underdog must have something sitting on it: the developed countries.
   The 'benefits' of nuclear energy form a cloak over the 'responsible' production of weapons-grade plutonium. If the 'inspectors' were to 'invade' Britain and audit the nuclear capability, little would, no doubt, be discovered. Look to the cash for peerages circus. A highly predictable outcome: a non-event. And a waste of time and money. But that money went somewhere. It didn't just disappear. Fortunes have been made and nobody has come to account. And never will. Such a spectacle would probably be unconstitutional and could never be brought to the world stage.
   Heard it all before?
   Hypocrisy always smells rotten. Obviously, there is no sensible and credible argument to counter Iran's declared interests in developing a nuclear power base. The developed West knows exactly the potential of such moves and is obviously the reason for the united opposition. To even mention oil in the era of climate change debate is quite amazingly ludicrous. Predictably so. The climate issue was completely ignored. Whatever the view on climate change, right or wrong, the current political climate demands that political attention turns toward it. A meaningless Nobel Peace Award has been donated in the name of politics and in so doing rubbishing all and any worthy past, present, or future winner(s). Clearly, the political game is being lost by resorting to such deep and dark measures.
   The answer was a desperate one as there can be no answer and if the left-hand or right-hand path is taken, they both lead to the same place: Hell. To the bystander, this goes unnoticed and appears to offer choices. No choice is on offer.

Madness Of Nuclear Power

Nuclear power is wanted by the West, but must be denied to any unfavoured (contemporary) regime. Nuclear power stations produce the materials for nuclear weapons. It's the only place such products can be made. At the same time, oil is alleged to be running out. The long-term case of pushing nuclear and sacrificing a Nobel Peace Award strongly suggests that the imminent failure of the oil fields is a lie. Scaremongering. The prize is $£trillions spent on creating nuclear power plants, making shedload after shedload of money and destabilising the World in pursuit of that money.
   Iraq and Iran are not 'nuclear powers', but with a little of the right help from Russia, China and Pakistan could constitute a powderkeg with Israel right in the middle. Then, of course, climate change can be mentioned since this involves more $£trillions. Incredibly backward thinking. Like many politicians, it is money talking, but never thinking.
   World domination firstly involves securing the military, controlling the money and so controlling the people.