True Cost Of Going Nuclear - To Whom?

Original posting, July 2006

Government 'greed' thinking: who will profit from a nuclear base?

Certainly the construction industry will. And who owns that?

Big business. Big money.

The 'mug' consumer who was never consulted, and never will be concerning this dreadful move, will pay a tax for an attempted clean up. This can never be done. The last lot hasn't been cleared up yet.

It cannot be

But create more anyway

'Nuclear' takes the pressure off restrictions using fossil fuels. The inevitable argument is that zero emission of CO2 means more can be used.

Don't overlook the elephant in the room: destruction of trees and vegetation (deforestation) continually reduces the ability of Earth to regenerate oxygen and as a consequence the CO2 concentration must build up. Humans respire so humans do contribute to the increase of atmospheric CO2, but not necessarily as the 'scientists' (governments) would have you believe.

Think nuclear power. Classic misdirection. While the magician performs his trick you are looking elsewhere. But, magicians are clever people. Government 'controllers' are a bit more transparent whatever they like to think of themselves.

This promotes greater revenue from oil taxation and it will run out even faster.

More wars, more mass killing, more military policing of the supply chain by the US for the US.

The illusion is of something positive being done for the environment, but actually it's all making it worse and also making a shedload of money for... someone.