Pyramid Comment

This journal takes an alternative view on current affairs and other subjects. The approach is likely to be contentious and is arguably speculative. The content of any article is also a reminder of the status of those affairs at that date. All comments have been disabled. Any and all unsolicited or unauthorised links are absolutely disavowed.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Metropolitan Police Disservice

The control of London streets becomes more sinister by the day. The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). In the pursuance of bestial control, the thugs that patrol these streets are dressed as pseudo-police. Other countries at least dress their state security enforcers as troopers and don't masquerade as 'police'. Prime minister, Dr James Gordon Brown, stays silent in any condemnation and in so doing condones the occasional death that 'happens'. This silence is a disgrace and brings the UQ (aka UK) Ltd into more disrepute than it already experiences. Control by fear. Crushing dissent. Screaming silence in any criticism of behaviours. The financial system is protected as though it were a revered god and not the devil that it really is.

But then, perhaps, the Devil is good and God is evil?

All the show opposition to Fred 'The Shred' Goodwin's pension is exposed as all rhetoric and nobody is surprised at that. Brown was Chancellor of the Exchequer and in no small way is responsible for the state of the UQ (aka UK) Ltd's economic downturn: 'crisis'. Police brutality? Silence even when death occurs. It should be no surprise that a second post mortem overturns the report issued at the first one by a coroner who was once discredited (GMC). The display of an 'officer's' ID is a legal requirement, but these honourable law enforcement individuals break the laws of the country they are alleged to be enforcing by covering up that ID to obviously attempt making identification at least difficult if not impossible. Obscuring a car registration by caking in mud is technically breaking the law and removing it completely would be too obvious. The majority of police are doubtless decent people doing a very difficult job if it involves policing against real crime and real criminals.

  • A firearms officer has died after suffering serious head injuries sustained while confronting several robbery suspects in east London. PC Gary Toms (37) was critically injured 11th April 2009.
This exemplifies bravery versus thuggery. These G20 state troopers dressed as police look more like a pack better placed on a rugby field. And that makes absolutely no allusion to behaviour or attempts to compare the one with the other. They are opposites.

Nobody was ever convicted of this murder (30 years ago). The practise of closing ranks in defiance will always protect the guilty. It's why it's done. Weakness shows the institutionalised cowardice. It takes little logic to conclude already that nobody will ever be prosecuted for the death of Ian Tomlinson on 1st April 2009 since the blow that allegedly caused his death could never be proven to be the cause of death. Crucially, he died 15 minutes after the blow had been delivered. There would appear little point in expecting anything different. Coroners:

Massive internal bleeding can be triggered as a result of assualt or simply falling over. An abdominal haemorrhage could be the result of suffering some kind of trauma. It's a fairly common occurrence as a result of blunt injury (road traffic accident, fall or assault). Although rare, it is possible that death could supervene. The cause of Ian Tomlinson's 'injury' is not known, though abdominal bleeding (haemorrhage) was the cause of death.

This will be the way out that avoids
any prosecution of a serving
 Metropolitan Police officer

Dr Freddy Patel who conducted the first postmortem said he found that his heart and liver were diseased. Patel had found a large amount of blood in Tomlinson's abdominal cavity, but still blamed heart attack for his death. Cary accepted that there was "evidence of coronary atherosclerosis..." though it was "unlikely to have contributed to the cause of death". Were the demonstrators who attacked the RBS building accosted by the 'police' in the same way as ordinary citizens undertaking peaceful and legal protest? If the attitude were different, it would suggest conspiracy. One thing is for sure, this entire scenario has probably had the result of encouraging the public to NOT assist an officer in need. The Met thugs have been highly successful and all the lack of assistance can be placed at that door. Their decent colleagues can at least thank them for that. This name is suggestive of something less 'official' like the territorial army rather than the army armed service. Photographing has been criminalised. The 'covering-up' of an 'officers' ID and photography criminalisation are two disturbing facts that together conspire to allow the state-police to go about 'their business' with effective impunity.