Brown, Gordon: Change

It's now been more than two months since the latest PM has occupied No. 10 Downing Street: placed into power and not elected by the citizens of UQ (aka UK) Ltd. The main emphasis of his incumbency (27th June 2007) featured a repetition of a single word:

Change

• Change in our NHS
• Change in our schools
• Change with affordable housing
• Change to build trust in government
• Change to protect and extend the British way of life

Examine the statements: Change in our NHS. What does that mean? Nothing really. Could be change for the better or change for the worse. Or its complete removal. That would be change. Gordon Brown probably goes private as I cannot imagine him entering into an NHS hospital as a patient. If this is the case then to say 'our NHS' is sickeningly patronising. Change in our schools. Improve the success rate of children by dumming down standards. This is an appalling action to take. Basic numeracy is not needed: electronic tills do all the calculations. Basic use of the English language is becoming redundant: 'texting' language is the most popular. Hopeless and useless unless you're just one idiot communicating with another idiot. No controlling influence over pupils by teachers allowed. Let alone possible. I fail to understand why some teachers are necessary in some schools: abused and no support from management. Kids don't want to learn, so 'encourage' learning by pointing out the benefits of an education. But since a life on state benefits is expected there is absolutely no need to pass any exam. Just pass through the school system as quickly as possible to reach a lifetime's success by achieving the donation of benefits for doing absolutely nothing. And all by the 15th birthday: dropping out day. What a future. The sum total of such wonderful guidance?

Zero

The really sad thing about all this is that the tiny 11-12 year olds imagine they're so smart. Being a streetwise kid who imagines a knowledge of how to get things and the life experience of an adult. Sad and pathetic. Real knowledge?

Zero

Chances of being effective in life?

None

So, the change will be to lower the school leaving age to 14 years old to increase the problems for families. Parents who need to work to make ends come close. They often don't meet. A non-educated future workforce who contributes nothing by virtue of being unemployable (not working). Where does the benefit financing come from? Fewer and fewer working adults. One good reason to ensure they work on longer and longer since they are the only source of government 'income' (this suggests that the pension disaster was actually engineered). When this workforce inevitably dies out what is left?

Nothing, zilch, zero

It's quite clear that the interest is only in the wealthy and helping them getting wealthier by making the less well-off (everyone else: the poor) pay for it all.

• What's the point as we are all going to die anyway. Is it simply self indulgence and selfishness during a lifetime? These are both short-lived for the individual, so presumably it is just for the purpose of self-gratification. Peculiar.

DA

One way is to reduce spending on the education of the future generations. Typical government thinking: think about getting through today and make as much money as possible and spend as little as possible. Think about tomorrow... ...tomorrow. Someone else's problem to sort out. To finish off what's been started with the illusion that

change

will happen. Yet not get any blame because

change

means avoiding all responsibility for causing the mess. Noticed how all the (still living presumably) 'self-important' politicians are rarely seen? All gone to that politicians' graveyard in the sky. Mess up planet Earth and retire to the home exo-planet. Such is the value of an absolute void. A vacuum. The end game is underway and is close to completion.

Change to zero

Earthbound 'wealth' doesn't exist (never did) and is

Zero

Change with affordable housing. Make it less affordable. Lending institutions can only appear to 'create' more virtual money. Debts go up so mortgage terms will continue to be extended. The illusion of everyone being better off will continue to be seen. Meltdown cannot be seen coming along with the momentum of an express train because the blinding light is so... ...blinding. Change to build trust in government. The apparent admission, or at least giving such an appearance, that people don't trust government. Wow!!! Rocket science. It isn't actually rocket science since the method of travel doesn't use rockets (too inefficient and nowhere near the capability for their required function). Consider the alternatives... Change to protect and extend the British way of life. An oxymoron. Totally contradictory. Unless it has the meaning of extending and protecting the worsening British way of life. Remember Brown's a Scotsman. Gordon Brown = GB for Gathering up Britain (Scottish Anthony Blair = AB for Alternative Britain) who controls from London, England. At least Brown speaks with a suitable accent. No masquerading there. Can you imagine an Englishman ever controlling an independent Scottish parliament from the heart of Scotland? The reverse of our 'reality'.

Change

Another ideal: to heal the divisions within his party and the country over the Iraq war, yet conspicuously no mention of Iraq. Today Blair, the departing PM at the time of handover (27.06.07), is currently the international envoy in the Middle East. Staggering hypocrisy, yet commentators push the argument that he is best placed to fulfill the function. Somewhat like petrol is the best fuel to ignite and sustain a fire. Incendiary action designed to exacerbate problems. Hardly pouring oil onto raging waters.

Just taking it out of the ground

Enough to make you feel ill - DA.