Banks - Recession To Depression
Predictably, it would happen. The banks would raise the cost of borrowing once they have been given 'free' (virtual money) finance with which to play. In the UQ (aka UK) Ltd, the sickening scenario exists that after being 'rescued' by the taxpayer, and with the implied collusion (G20) of other governments around the world, the banks then 'lend' this theoretical money to those people who 'lent' it in the first place. The situation has been created like this hypothetical finance. The timing shows that a plan was started months ago ready for the G20
Stitchup (BIG FIX)
The banks have been 'reluctant' to lend, but the strategy has involved creating the demand as potential borrowers are made to wait and become more anxious and consequently more amenable to accepting grotesque rates of interest to borrow from the bank money that they have, in principle, lent to the bank in the first place. It's classic. It's repugnant.
Create the problem and
provide the solution
Consider this against:
"Don't give me problems, give me solutions"
or
"Don't provide solutions, just give us problems"
It's so...
Talking about imbeciles in denial. Depressingly dull. The oxymoron-concept of real virtual money is... a reality. There is no money. There never has been, but the game works by charging interest (yet more virtual money) in the debt-based financial system. Without it there is no growth. That meaningless word that describes nothing (same ethos as affordable), but is associated with advancement. Or going backwards believing it's forwards. Seemingly confused and highly contradictory. Rates of interest on loans are being charged at up to 21% for some personal loans. Lloyds TSB, Yorkshire Bank, Clydesdale Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland-owned NatWest are amongst the group. It's suggestive of a cartel that after creating the problem (the increased demand by delay) and then providing the loan solution, has operated in a fashion that is both...
Simultaneous and co-ordinated
That NatWest is the offering bank and not RBS creates the obnoxius atmosphere that RBS does not wish to be obviously associated with these loans. The well-deserved bad publicity could affect the people choosing this outlet of increased debt. It's how parasitic banks make money. Redistribution at it's most blatant. Technically it's not profiteering, just moving the fixed amount from one hand to the other. Diamonds are dribbled into the global community (economy) whenever it's necessary to make more money. The price of diamonds does not come down as it's a scarce 'commodity'. Price will increase, but value moves downwards. The more there are the less they are worth. Flood a market with oil causing a glut and the price drops. Create scarcity and the price escalates. Very basic finance-massaging principles. This is seen in action all the time.
The demand for oil is increased while still living in the delusion that climate control is important. It's continued massaging of the system. Creating the (global population) climate for yet more control. The people (host) are the only half of the partnership that pays for the other business half (parasite) to cream off more of the illusory wealth by moving more debt onto the host, thereby creating more interest for the parasite. Value of property massaged to fall creating a market for failure and consequently profit through misery. Global economies are creating and producing more redundancy. Income from savings collapses as money continues to be redistributed. Higher bank fees with decreasing finances to pay for it. More debt. More misery. More control of the masses. All the time the problem escalates without any effort to curtail it: population growth. The only goal that makes any sense is to gain absolute control and complete subjugation of the people.
The circus gets more distorted and shaped like a square, while evermore dangerously cynical.
That NatWest is the offering bank and not RBS creates the obnoxius atmosphere that RBS does not wish to be obviously associated with these loans. The well-deserved bad publicity could affect the people choosing this outlet of increased debt. It's how parasitic banks make money. Redistribution at it's most blatant. Technically it's not profiteering, just moving the fixed amount from one hand to the other. Diamonds are dribbled into the global community (economy) whenever it's necessary to make more money. The price of diamonds does not come down as it's a scarce 'commodity'. Price will increase, but value moves downwards. The more there are the less they are worth. Flood a market with oil causing a glut and the price drops. Create scarcity and the price escalates. Very basic finance-massaging principles. This is seen in action all the time.
The demand for oil is increased while still living in the delusion that climate control is important. It's continued massaging of the system. Creating the (global population) climate for yet more control. The people (host) are the only half of the partnership that pays for the other business half (parasite) to cream off more of the illusory wealth by moving more debt onto the host, thereby creating more interest for the parasite. Value of property massaged to fall creating a market for failure and consequently profit through misery. Global economies are creating and producing more redundancy. Income from savings collapses as money continues to be redistributed. Higher bank fees with decreasing finances to pay for it. More debt. More misery. More control of the masses. All the time the problem escalates without any effort to curtail it: population growth. The only goal that makes any sense is to gain absolute control and complete subjugation of the people.
The circus gets more distorted and shaped like a square, while evermore dangerously cynical.
posted by Louis Brothnias @ 2:41 am
<< Home