Resurgence Of The Nuclear Power Issue

The expected fait accompli decision will be made today. The outcome will be as expected: nuclear power it is. Or it will be very shortly. Within 24 hours. The justification is the political exploitation of global warming. The reason given is wrong. It is not the increase in carbon dioxide alone. This is probably a very minor contributing factor, but the cyclical reasons are ignored. They are not useful to promote nuclear power. To sell it to the people.

Get them to buy in: MADNESS

The badly informed public are the tools to make MONEY. We'll all die as a result.

Radioactivity is very, very dangerous

Think just of Polonium-210. A few micrograms of this substance is lethal. Absolutely no chance of survival. Whatever the material, radioactive substances are very, very dangerous. Even in Whitehall. Politicians seem to be either just stupid or even simply ignorant. It could, of course, simply be pure

GREED

That's for wealth AND power. You decide for yourself. The alternatives are ignored. Not enough money is to be made compared to building many nuclear power stations.

It's still about MONEY and NOT survival

Defer the problem as it will go away? Of course not! The 'new' problem is nuclear waste and rendering it safe. That cannot be done. It's more likely the pursuit of money, money, money, wealth, more money. And more and more... It's going to kill us all. Probably not in my lifetime, but my children. Typical short-term lunatic thinking of the money-makers. Alistair Darling is just another architect of destruction. It's madness. Pure and simple:

MADNESS

To use the example of France as a successful nuclear economy is simply 'throwing a googly'. One country is bad enough, but now UQ (aka UK) Ltd. The additional nuclear waste that is clean because it does not produce any CO2 is absolutely very, very dangerous talk. It maybe a true statement, but is dreadfully misleading.

'Talking up' by MADMEN to make a lethal subject sound like it's a good idea to take us all down

Think of shark-infested waters: if you can't see the sharks, no doubt it's safe to swim. Go for it. Especially if Alistair Darling were to say so. He wouldn't do it. Do you remember John Gummer feeding his own daughter a beefburger at the height of the BSE outbreak? Using his own daughter to make a political point. Used a child. His own child. Nasty. Really nasty. But he was a politician and they have to show faith and support the party (political).

But by using his own child?

We are moving forward along the same road to:

Hell

It's a one-way road with no return. Ever.

MADNESS MADNESS MADNESS

Wait for 'Call me Dave' Cameron to endorse this landmark decision. I anticipate this within 24 hours of the decision being officially made. Sometime today?

The entire issue is a 'no brainer' - cabinet chief science adviser, Sir David King.