Anarchy In Democracy Or Democratic Anarchy

 

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard".

H.L. Mencken

Isn't democracy a wonderful thing? Nearly everybody has been 'persuaded' that having a vote is the way forward for a developed society. This is actually rather perverse. To allow the Great Unwashed majority to be 'governed' (aka: controlled) by a very small minority and actually accept it is right to elect such a group with effectively a signed blank cheque. Those 'elected' are simply equals that are magically raised to special status for absolutely no reason. They are not some kind of special improved human who knows "better". It's rather quaint ideology that some rich individual or wealthy group [has disproportionate control of a majority holding, be it legally acquired or otherwise] is somehow "better".

Corporate Mantra
Manipulation
The French Way - corruption

If it wasn't a characteristic of (only) some members of society who will take control if they can, then anarchy would be a good thing. This is democracy in action and control is 'freely given' to the few. The prize is the seat of power. The source of motivation for drive.

Paradox oxymoron

There is a downside: it would mean being absolutely responsible for self, but without being selfish. Surprisingly, it's possible, just not the "successful" way. Paul Newman (1925-2008) has been quoted [The Observer 1982] as saying

"Show me a good loser and I'll show you a loser"

and is a stereotypical expression that assumes everyone must think with the same set of distorted "principles" of life or be held in contempt. It simply demonstrates a very shallow view that insists on being in control (Winners and Losers).

Devil's Advocate

A discussion point: 

anarchy or bullying? 

and constitutes a semantic debate.

Another debating point would be about gaining possession:

acquisition or appropriation?

Discuss.

05.01.2022
 

The hypocrisy is staggering: "It’s our democracy that is at stake."

   “We will not yield,” Yaël Braun-Pivet, of the ruling La République en Marche (La REM) party, told parliament, referring to death threats which she said politicians of all stripes had received.

 

In a democracy free will allows a choice to be made between two or more options. In France, there is only one choice that promises continued 'freedom'. Unless this option is selected then isolation from society is legally enforced and any right of passage is denied.

 

Austria - mandated vaccination or else... hunted down. The 'hunters' need to be either vaccinated against

 

or fully recovered 

 

from C***D. The hunters themselves do not need to be vaccinated but can still hunt down those that aren't.

 

This is facism. Totalinarianism. Dictatorship

   Refusal to be innoculated with an unproven-safe cocktail, the contents of which are not declared (mRNA?), and for a reason that has also never been demonstrated to be true (Canada now blocking FOIs), is punishable by forced removal from society... or worse. If people 'freely' choose to be 'jabbed' with something purporting to be a life-saviour against an unseen assassin (literally - an electron microscope can not produce a clear image of any pathogen) then that is their 'choice' even though deceit is rampant. This is easily demonstrated.

 

Kary Mullis won the Nobel Prize (1993) for chemistry by inventing the

most significant technique (molecular cloning) of the 20th century.

 

The fraudulent 'test' was 'invented' 

by Christian Drosten.

 

Even more as a totalitarian dictator, the French president Emmanuel Macron has promised (05.01.2022), using some very non-presidential language, ‘to make life miserable for people who refuse to get vaccinated against C***D-19’.

French leader draws fire with vow to make life "miserable" for C***D vaccine refusers

Saving humanity - H.L.Mencken

 

Saving humanity is a euphemism for ruling over humanity

 

In the case of the new mRNA ‘vaccine’ technology [a gene therapy (Pfizer website) that in theory either replaces a defective gene or adds a missing one - i.e. gene editing affects the genome inside a cell] it is an experimental product untested (until now) on humans. There is no data (information) that is either supportive or otherwise. The phase 3 clinical trial will not be completed until 2023.

 

Study start: 29.04.2020

Estimated primary completion: 29.10.2020

Estimated study completion: 06.04.2023

 

The manufacturers have been given 100% protection from prosecution (indemnity) regarding any adverse effect including death.