Ethos
Science (scientific/factual)
I am a scientist
I practise wordcraft
I develop/manage:
blogs (web logs) = Journals
What I do care about is the translation of this 'fact' into "must be explicit and disturbing" without checking. Very amateurish. Public or private defamatory and libelous statements are actionable. This is why I am very careful about what I publish in the public domain.
Occasionally, a "web moderator" (policeman) decides to slur a clean website - this one. Libelous and defamatory (both actionable) labels are then firmly placed upon me and my reputation. No effort has been made to substantiate claims, which are ALL totally untrue. Examination of the content quickly reveals this. It would take a thorough search to still discover there is NOTHING that can be construed as explicit (adult) or disturbing.
Informative - YES
Thought Provoking - YES
Interesting - MAYBE
Explicit - NO
Disturbing - NO
All content is safe
Comment conclusions are derived from a reasoned argument and any 'fact' is supported by an original or independent source where possible. I do not read from somebody else's script, but write my own. This is the nature of a blog. Independent thought is not influenced by anyone or anything else. As new information is understood opinions can change. This shift in opinion is reflected in these journals.
I do not intend to cause offence, but to voice
Thought Provoking - YES
Interesting - MAYBE
Explicit - NO
Disturbing - NO
All content is safe
Comment conclusions are derived from a reasoned argument and any 'fact' is supported by an original or independent source where possible. I do not read from somebody else's script, but write my own. This is the nature of a blog. Independent thought is not influenced by anyone or anything else. As new information is understood opinions can change. This shift in opinion is reflected in these journals.
I do not intend to cause offence, but to voice
an alternative point of view.
This is not negative thinking, but challenging.
A great deal of the subject content (especially government - DA)
A great deal of the subject content (especially government - DA)
demands challenge. To examine issues.
It's all very personal and, therefore, subjective.
I think for myself. Opinions are my own and I accept full
responsibility for them.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion,
The Philosophical Journal contains ideas that spontaneously occur to me
A Science Journal deals with factual entries
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion,
but not to his own facts
A Science Journal deals with factual entries
- Comment Philosophical Science (Journals)
The original postings date from April 2005 - November 2006. Currently, dates are up to October 2020. The reason for separating articles is that over 360 entries had been made and different types of postings were progressively becoming confused. To this end, there are now three new sources each with an index to simplify finding a particular topic.
It should be noted that although many of the Comment entries are of a political nature, any view described is personal. I attempt to highlight what I believe may be a 'hidden agenda' and areas that adversely affect the majority of UQ (aka UK) Ltd citizens. This constitutes the attempted control of the population within this country and is becoming more and more apparent. Much less subtle. Such control has become patently obvious and what bothers me is that we are walking into a potential nightmare with eyes wide shut.
The psychological exploitation of the introvert/extrovert (Susan Cain) is crude, but unfortunately quite effective.
- The removal of UQ (aka UK) Ltd when referencing the UK was in preparation of better times (May-June 2010), but sadly and predictably, affairs have declined.
- The term may be reintroduced as appropriate.
<< Home