Gays and 'Marriage'

Original posting, January 2006

According to the newspapers (!), the politically correct (pc) brigade - what an odd term - has decided that ‘marriage’ should be renamed ‘ceremony’ at registery offices so that gays (homosexuals) are not offended. The ethic is... OFFENSIVE. It is irritating that this ‘pc’ crew of arrogant idiots (whoever these faceless people are that make these decisions) can attempt to influence thinking.

There is clearly a long term effort to subvert long standing conventions. Most people end up in prison for subversion. Not this bunch: downplay marriage, remove tax advantages, allow adoption by homosexual couples and so raise children in a distorted environment as the new ‘natural’. Normality. The norm. If people choose same sex ‘marriage’ that is their choice. Choices must not be restricted by pandering to minority groups (and they still are - DA).

You see how it happens: the law was changed to allow same sex marriage. THEN the term was altered from ‘marriage’ to ‘ceremony’, but only afterwards. Imagine trying to introduce it any other way. It’s insidious. Nasty.

Procreation requires a male/female mating - humans are simply a different sentient animal species: humans, orangutans and chimpanzees are the only three species on Earth to be selfaware (like it or not they are all related and that doesn’t bother me - DA). There is no political motivation. That’s so dull and boring. Life is so much more interesting.

This doesn't involve a powered ego trip, but straightforward genetics. In a Darwinian sense, an orangutan or chimpanzee would probably make a better friend over some humans. What these pc people would presumably prefer is parthenogenesis. Like the aphid that procreates without sex. The hermaphrodite: the boy and girl in the same pair of trousers (thanks to Phil Collins for that quote, ex Genesis. Sad day when these guys disbanded - DA).