Arrogant 'First Man'
The demonstration of conceit is common today. The arrogance. The 'in your face' contempt. The stereotypical hypocrisy of a stance. The 'I don't care what you think' attitude. 'I do as I please and if you don't like it, then tough' attitude.
Apart from all that, it is a morality code of sorts. Couple that with talk about poverty and it all fits together quite consistently. Obviously 'First Lady' freebie Blair since there is nobody else as important except the one to whom she is married (remember Blair?) as an male ex-head of state.
I always thought that the Queen was the head of state in a monarchy and so in the reverse sense, Royal consort Prince Philip should be 'First Man'. And we have the two Princes (bloodline).
Perhaps Mrs Blair sees herself as The Queen fighting for Human Rights. That makes her husband: King Tony.
Technically, the label I should wear is probably a Humanist embracing scientific scepticism. Communism doesn't work, although as a theory it could. But it cannot work as hypocritical communists are, in fact, camouflaged capitalists (George Orwell's Animal Farm). And political capitalists actually come over as communists: The New Labour Communist Party. It's got the sweet smell of honesty about that label, but labels don't really work as there are too many shades of grey.
Margaret Thatcher's opposition to the (ultimate) perverted concept of a Federal Europe would have made politics in Europe more for the people and less for the few: in the European Parliament. At least, in theory. The reality is much, much worse. It's coming. Inexorably coming. Too many influential 'meal tickets' for the taxpayer to look after. The elephants' graveyard for the politician. To keep the imagined influential in their pig trough of excess.
<< Home