Pyramid Comment

This journal takes an alternative view on current affairs and other subjects. The approach is likely to be contentious and is arguably speculative. The content of any article is also a reminder of the status of those affairs at that date. All comments have been disabled. Any and all unsolicited or unauthorised links are absolutely disavowed.

Sunday, November 19, 2006

Bargain Basement

Original posting, August 2006

The selling technique of 3 for 2 suggests a bargain - if you want three of something. It may work like this: sell each 'reduced' item at the true price so sell three items at once. If a single item (or two items) is sold then a higher individual price is reached.

Example: 3 for 2 @ 99p each. Buy 2 for £1.98 (and get 3) suggests the third item is free. Each works out at 66p instead of 99p. A 33.3% saving and a real bargain. Not when you consider the true selling price as 66p, then buying just 1 or 2 units will cost you 50% more at 99p each. Similarly, get 2 for the price of 1. Probably sell twice as many items as it appears cheaper. The true cost of each unit costs 100% less than the declared selling price. Then if the item is sold singularly, there is 100% higher cost. Example: say an item has a true selling price of 25p. If the sale is then 2 for 1 they'd go for 50p. If you buy only 1 then you still pay 50p = 25p + 25p (100%). Another ploy: take off 2 for 1 sale and sell a pack only individually, but adding 33% more content (it's how fruit is sold). Say the true selling price of a standard pack size is 25p. Add 33% more content and the true cost increases to 33p (25p+8p). But this then sells for 50p as that was the earlier selling price in a 2 for 1 deal, but with 33% greater pack size. Bargain. But this is still 17p profit on top of the 33p and is 17/33 = +50% markup.

Things are never what they seem are they?