Pyramid Comment

This journal takes an alternative view on current affairs and other subjects. The approach is likely to be contentious and is arguably speculative. The content of any article is also a reminder of the status of those affairs at that date. All comments have been disabled. Any and all unsolicited or unauthorised links are absolutely disavowed.

Monday, February 01, 2021

Carl Heneghan (Professor)

Bill Gates πŸ˜ˆ

Heneghan, Carl Professor

Carl Heneghan is Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and a practising GP. A clinical epidemiologist, he studies patients receiving care from clinicians, especially those with common problems, with the aim of improving the evidence base used in clinical practice.

death numbers

Heneghan, Carl Professor - discusses infection and

disease management

Heneghan, Carl Professor - Doomsday predictions

vs flattening of case data

Heneghan, Carl Professor - If we don't accept it's endemic

we don't focus on those who actually need protection

Heneghan, Carl Professor 

Heneghan, Carl Professorno evidence of a 2nd wave

Heneghan, Carl Professor - scrap 'rule of six'

Heneghan, Carl Professor - the age structure

Heneghan, Carl Professor - COVID-19

trends and background context

Saturday, January 30, 2021

Bill Gates

Vaccine update

Additional (important)

Bill Gates 😈 + Pfizer (current - 18.02.2021) connection

Bill Gates πŸ˜ˆ - (mobile) banking next target

relies on smartphone = WiFi = 5G

Patent #WO2020060606 is described as a "Cryptocurrency System Using Body
Activity Data"Microsoft has partnered with VeriChip (FDA approved 'biohack - (11.08.2020) manufacturer Digital Angel Corporation since 2008

Tracking alludes to pet recovery = surveillance of humans?

Digital Angel Corporation's four divisions serve consumers directly as well as organisations ranging from farmers to hospitals ... from law enforcement agencies and prisons to the U.S. Department of Energy

Bill Gates πŸ˜ˆ - America's biggest owner of farmland

see Digital Angel (above)

Bill Gates πŸ˜ˆ - Bilderberg (Spain 2010)

Bill Gates 😈 - dictatorship plan

Bill Gates 😈 - DTP vaccine - Killed More

Children in Africa Than the Diseases it Targeted

Bill Gates 😈 exposed (Messiah complex) - Vaccine Dictatorship Plan

Bill Gates of Hell 😈 - silence any opposition to controlling the World

Bill Gates 😈 & Melinda Gates, and Boris Johnson (20.05.2020)

request for full recording and minutes (denied)

Bill Gates πŸ˜ˆ+ Matt Hancock Boris Johnson + Chris Whitty +

Bill Gates 😈Monopolised Global Health

Bill Gates 😈 + Pfizer

Bill Gates 😈 - Population Control Conspiracy Theories

Bill Gates 😈 - predicts (17.12.2020) next (future) pandemic

what does he know - at this moment?

Bill Gates πŸ˜ˆ - SERCO connection

Patent 060606 (a joke? - DA)

Bill Gates 😈 vaccinate the world (with what? - DA)

Bill Gates 😈 - vaccine spreads polio across Africa

Bill Gates 😈 - UN forced to admit Gates-funded vaccine

is causing polio outbreak in Africa (04.09.2020)

Bill Gates 😈 - investment in vaccines

4 Coronavirus Vaccine Stocks

Gates Foundation is betting on

Bill Gates 😈 and Alfred Bourla (CEO Pfizer) vaccinated

undefined but... in the future (maybe - DA)

Bill Gates πŸ˜ˆ - Boris Johnson pledges Β£571 million to COVAX

Mutual congratulation. Johnson doesn't respond to 'tweets'

 except for Bill Gates (worth $133 billion)

Boris Johnson’s effusive response to a tweet from Bill Gates, which the public couldn’t comment on, and the draconian restrictions imposed on the UK without debate are indicative of the way democracy has been suspended in 2020Johnson is there to...
tell us what to do, not to hear
what we have to say


There was no greater example of this than the recent Twitter exchange he had with US billionaire and vaccine promoter Bill GatesGates tweeted that it was β€œgreat to see” the UK commit β€œvital funding” (Β£550m) to a global COVID-19 vaccine scheme, and said that BoJo’s plan would improve β€œthe way we prepare for future crises like this”

Prime Minister Johnson (or at least the person operating his account), doesn’t respond to ordinary members of the public raising issues with him on Twitter. He doesn’t respond to them by letter either...

Great to see the UK commit vital funding to ensure COVID-19 vaccines are available for the world’s poorest people. PM @BorisJohnson's plan will improve the way we prepare for future crises like this

Bill Gates (@BillGates) September 26, 2020

Fantastic to have your support Bill. We will work with our friends around the world to ensure vaccines reach the poorest and deliver our five poinplan to protect humanity against another pandemic

Boris Johnson (@BorisJohnson) September 28, 2020

Should this be to protect the poorest

of humanity from Bill Gates? -  DA

Bill Gates πŸ˜ˆ - UK Government - vaccine

Bill Gates 😈 - voodoo doll of COVID-19 conspiracies (05.06.2020)

Bill Gates 😈 + (Chris) Whitty

Bill Gates πŸ˜ˆ - worth $133 billion

where does he keep his money?

Friday, January 29, 2021



Bill Gates πŸ˜ˆ

PCR - Heneghan, Carl

   This very basic information is many months too late. The PCR test has been wrongly accepted as the gold standard of testingIt is notBefore and since the pandemic [NHS (page 16) 45 cycles after and 35 cycles before - even 35 PCR cycles is too many] it has always been 'unfit for purpose'. There has never been any standard or calibration - a consistent number of cycles that must be stated in every test. Test centre results cannot be comparedOne laboratory and a different laboratory could give a very different results with far-reaching consequencesOne positive. The other negative.

    Because of this gross neglect the global lockdowns have all been based on flawed information. Any competent CMO would be acquainted with the PCR test limitations and of the consequences of failure to advise Governments accordingly. As a consequence, the roll-out of a 'vaccine' in the absense of long-term safety data has been authorised. This does not define an approved 'vaccine'. Only its (safety unprovenuse under 'emergency' status. This has produced a (probable) human disaster.

   All Government CMOs are collectively responsible for the expected damage caused. To both humans and the economy. The cost of buying these unnecessary and potentially dangerous 'vaccines' is enormous. Outcomes are unknown as is the safety of any 'vaccine'Creating the conditions of fear have falsely 'encouraged' people to accept (demand, Louis DA) the 'vaccine'.


Problem - Reaction - Solution


Clarification of terms

Ct (cycle threshold) values represent the number of cycles of amplification elapsed before the test system signals detection of the target. In general terms, the higher the Ct value the lower the quantity of virus target present in the sample. Precise definition of what constitutes a high or very high Ct value is difficult because a Ct value is not comparable to the quantitative output from a calibrated assay. The Ct value for a given sample will be different in different laboratories depending on the test platform. In general terms for this report a Ct value of 30 or greater is considered a high Ct value and a value of 35 or greater is considered a very high Ct value. It is appropriate for laboratories to adjust these thresholds based on their experience (that's very subjective, Louis - DA) with the platform they are using.

For the purposes of this paper a β€œpositive test” means that the test result meets appropriate criteria to be reported as positive. In general terms, in an assay detecting multiple targets (? - DA), detection of a single target at a high or a very high Ct value should be: (a) reported as either equivocal or not detected based on the reporting policy of the laboratory and their experience (again, that's very subjective, Louis - DA) with the platform and assay in use or; (b) retested on the same or a second platform before reporting. In an assay detecting a single target, detection of that target at a high or very high Ct value should result retesting on the same or a second platform before reporting. Samples with high or very high Ct values that are not reproducible on re-testing should generally be reported to the effect that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was either not confirmed, or SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected. If reported as not confirmed or not detected, no further action is required and the result should not be notified to public health. If the laboratory chooses to report the result as equivocal, it is appropriate to request a repeat sample if clinically appropriate. If reported as equivocal the result should not be notified to public health.


Louis, is there a financial inducement

to report positive? - DA

35 cycles (! - DA) is deceitful Worse than useless

"It's just dead nucleoids, period.”


(Fauci continues to be deceitfulAnything over ~20 cycles is deceitful DA) 

  • 2^45 = > 35 trillion (positive) = 45 cycles
  • 2^20 = > 1 million (negative) = 20 cycles

 Signal amplified (from 1 x strand RNA) additionally by

 x 35 million (2^20 = 1048576)

demanding the public be tested?
COVID-19 testing program. No mention of cycle number
ignore landmark ruling 'not fit for purpose'

deathly silent legally ruled 'useless' (1)

deathly silent legally ruled 'useless' (2) 04.12.2020

...discredited PCR test (abuse) search results

PCR test - cases numbers plummet as the cycle number

(realistically) adjusted

for no reason (Michael Mina MD PhD)
massive COVID-19 false positives

PCR test WHO finally admits to 'problem(1)

PCR test WHO finally admits to 'problem(2)

PCR test WHO finally admits tests are 'unreliable' (3)

PCR test - search results