Pyramid Comment

This journal takes an alternative view on current affairs and other subjects. The approach is likely to be contentious and is arguably speculative. The content of any article is also a reminder of the status of those affairs at that date. All comments have been disabled. Any and all unsolicited or unauthorised links are absolutely disavowed.

Saturday, September 12, 2020

Coronavirus - conclusion

 12.09.2020 (Twin Towers - 11.09.2011)


The coronavirus 'pandemic' (global) has all the hallmarks of a hoax. Much like the appollo missions (NASA - Never A Straight Answer - DA) and the lunar landings. Still, 50 years later there is a growing number of people that are not just skeptical but of the firm opinion of 'hoax'. A persistent lie, based on the original lie. Such is it with the coronavirus 'pandemic'.


They wouldn't lie us, would they



They wouldn't lie us.

Would they?

   The timing is wonderful. Winter is looming. Restrictions ('legally' enforceable forbidden acts - DA) and a second wave is allegedly underway (ie so we are 'told' - DA). More like a second wave of scaremongering to violently nudge people into accepting an untried/untested 'vaccine'. This is unprecedented. Any untested 'new' medication being forced onto people would cause public outrage. But not a vaccine. Already, volunteers are getting ill and a vaccine is proposed to be ready by early year-end? The army (more authoritarian than just a doctor - DA) will be 'asked' (tasked? - DA) with rolling out inoculations for the entire nation (except Louis and ...? - DA). The annual 'flu vaccine will also be 'freely' available to a greater number than have ever before been eligible. What is in this 'vaccine'? Something to 'fight off' a 'flu virus? Or a coronavirus vaccine by the back door? Tricking (deceit - DA) people into accepting a potentially very dangerous - something. Nothing more (! - DA) than an unknown 'injectable liquid' - containing some tracking nanoparticle? It is entirely possible (probable? - DA) that any 'spike' is being deliberately introduced into selected places (is it demographic? - DA).

   If the coronavirus vaccine is just 'different' to the 'flu virus vaccine, do the two interreact? How safe is it to have two vaccines at the same time. Of course, if they are one and the same there can be no conflict. Simply a very dangerous single entity - given twice? There are many caveats with a 'flu vaccine and this is with vaccines that have been in existence for some years. A new and 'untested' vaccine being 'forced' into people by medically untrained army personnel (maybe trained in giving an injection but having little medical knowledge to provide the best of patient care) is a very dangerous scenario. Many may be ill-advised to receive a vaccine and specialised knowledge is a prerequisite to safety. This is totally absent. It's immoral and the Hippocratic Oath will be trampled on. Doctors should be outraged by what they are to be asked to do. To do no harm is the ethic. This is contrary to the UK Government's expectation of a qualified doctor. It's a nauseating concept.

    Covid marshalls will have no formal powers. But denouncement of family and friends (by neighbours) to the authorities (who do have powers - DA) has sinister overtones to the Hitler Youth and the rise of Nazism.

   The 'news' (propaganda machine - DA) is already rife with scare stories. It is now transparently obvious that the aim is to instill terror to make people more compliant and to not just accept a 'vaccine' without any challenge... but fight to get to the head of the queue.

  • One of the most disturbing features of the whole 'narrative' is that many (most? - DA) people are taking the Government's (and BBC) voice as truth (1984). Articles like this one are called conspiracy theories and ignored. It is not that anyone should necessarily agree with what is debated here but that consideration of the content should be given. When read, the informed choice can then be made. It is known as an open mind to ideas and not closed-box-'thinking'.

   World Wars 1 and 2 were fought traditionally with weapons to kill people. World War 3 continues as a financial onslaught and World War 4 is to be by subjugation and the eventual installation of the New World Order (conspiracy theory? - DA). An example of the typical 'rubbishing' tactic comes from America. Simply announcing (arrogantly) how dangerous it is to even suggest an alternative viewpoint. The attempt to prevent any learning about the


is so transparant. The comments made here are totally reasonable unless you follow the direction you are 'instructed' to follow. Then, of course, you accept that only 'official' channels tell the truth.

   The coronavirus entries are still made but as there is so much massaged allegation (lies) (and every day there are more and more and more... - DA), they will be only occasional:

when possibly important.

And be careful Louis, they'll

probably have you locked-up for sedition

when everybody else is locked-down.

About the same thing - DA


A Question of Sport - viewing figures

This is STILL a very popular program. The real question is why the BBC should decide to fire the three current individuals hosting the show - team captains Matt Dawson and Phil Tufnell and presenter Sue Barker - each a successful sportsperson in their own field. Respectively, Rugby, Cricket, and Tennis. It cannot be ageism (Strictly Come Dancing - Arlene Phillips - 20.05.2020). So, what could be an explanation?

   If Eastenders or some other 'soap opera' was cancelled there would probably be national outrage. But the audience is possibly very different for each type of TV slot. It boils down to the likelihood of compliance with government restrictions (don't just jump when told - ask how high? - DA). A punishment ahead of any 'crime' is to remove the enjoyment from a perceived non-compliant population. Do as you're told and question and challenge nothing. And receive a reward - programs are left untouched.

   The BBC has done this type of thing before - Top Gear. The three GITS (STIG backwards) have undeniable chemistry. Not only did the BBC shoot off its foot but actually the entire leg (and more -  DA).

Tuesday, June 02, 2020

Coronavirus contents 26 - 30

26. Death certificates and post-mortems

The rules in England and Wales regarding death certificates have changed.

Certification of Death

After a death has been verified, a certificate (Medical Certificate of Cause of Death – MCCD) must be completed and submitted to the local registrar of births, marriages, and deaths. The certificate must be completed by a doctor who is registered (including temporary registration) and licensed to practice with the GMC. In addition to other details required on the certificate, the doctor must provide to the best of their knowledge and belief a cause of death. The cause entered is a matter of clinical judgement, determined by weighing up the patient’s recent and past medical history and the circumstances of their death.

When a doctor cannot reasonably give a likely
cause of death the case must be submitted to the
coroner for investigation which may include
a post-mortem examination of the body
to establish a cause of death.

   Under COVID-19 arrangements, where the GP has completed the MCCD, it will be emailed to the registrar’s office, rather than being collected from the surgery. In those cases where the doctor is confident on medical grounds that a particular cause of death is likely then that should be entered on the MCCD.

COVID-19 is an acceptable direct or underlying cause of death for the purposes of completing the MCCD, even without the results of a positive test, and it is important that likely COVID-19 deaths are reported as such via the registrar. The rules surrounding the completion of the MCCD have changed following the Coronavirus Act 2020.

This Act was introduced into law 19.03.2020.
It is very detailed and comprehensive and
must have been prepared some while
before this and so
pre-empted the future -  DA

In order for a doctor to complete a MCCD without referral to the coroner any doctor must have seen (including via video link) the patient in the 28 days before death, or alternatively in person after death.

video link ... in the 28 days before death,
or alternatively in person after death

If these conditions are met, then a doctor may complete a MCCD which is sent to the registrar who will record the death and complete the paperwork to allow burial or cremation. If these conditions are not met but the doctor is satisfied regarding the likely cause of death, then a MCCD may still be issued but should be clearly marked to indicate that the person was seen neither in the 28 days before death or after death.
   In such circumstances the case must be referred to the coroner. The process for this referral is defined at a local level by each coroner, but the doctor will be required to explain the medical history and circumstances of the death to help the coroner British Medical Association 3 reach a determination. The coroner may then issue a form 100A sanctioning the completion of the registration process, or they may choose to order a post-mortem examination. The conditions above are the subject of a BMA request to government (sic).
   We have asked that any clinician (not just a doctor) may have attended the patient in the 28 days before death and that this may include telephone (not just video) consultationsWe believe this more correctly reflects the reality of the way in which GP teams of specialist allied health professionals deliver care. We have also asked that where no contact has taken place before death that the requirement to attend after death can also be via video link with the funeral director. These are changes that could significantly speed up the certification process and reduce the expected surge in demand on the coronial system, thereby speeding up the process for grieving families and reducing their suffering. We are aware that some coroners have already signalled their local agreement to such a pragmatic approach.

Essentially, it can all happen remotely and
by assumption even in the absence of a
positive (or negative, Louis - DA) test

Currently, in Scotland (11.04.2020) a post-mortem (autopsy) is no longer required for someone who died of ('any'? - DA) coronavirus. The death may have been associated with this infection (somewhere) but not necessarily caused by it. Possible heart failure. An unexpected death in a person who has no other known health conditions. The whole point of an autopsy is to establish the cause of death. Any sudden death must be explained. To no longer require a post-mortem is a potentially very dangerous move. Any older person could have death 'arranged' (murdered) and no-one would ever know. Especially, if the person had 'flu or even a heavy cold they would test positive for ('a' - DA) coronavirus. The assumption would wrongly be a natural death (any coronavirus or COVID-19? - DA). Such a scenario is made so easy. 'Assisted suicide' is illegal - possibly to help prevent inheritance fraud by murder, whether this is the case or a genuine desire to end a terminally ill person's suffering. A pet can be 'put to sleep' but a person must continue to suffer.

27. Surveillance

Surveillancetracking the movements of everybody. Watch out for the (untested long-term effects - DA) vaccines - nanoparticles and tracking?

28. Wake-up, Shake-up Call

The current situation has had the great benefit of focusing minds. Unfortunately, when the problem ceases (not necessarily gone away), people forget - conveniently. Rather than adapting as the result of learning. In different regions across the world, there have been many issues. They have been not regarded as serious problems. Somebody else should be concerned about them.
   Never before has the UK or Europe or America faced such an issue and so these regions have ignored the Chinese epidemics.

Not my problems


29. COVID-19

Accident, Deliberate...

or a Deliberate "Accident"?


The worldwide spread of coronavirus may have been caused as the result of an accident. Wuhan is in Central China and is a densely populated city. The Wuhan Institute of Virology is in close proximity (10km) to Huanan Seafood Market. Where the ensuing pandemic (coincidentally! - DA) is alleged to have been traced.

Xiaohongshan Middle Area No. 44
Hubei China

   Another 'smoking barrel' is the:

Minzhu Road No. 504 Block 4 Yimen 201,
Hubei China

This is less than 300m from the

More confusion into the mix (true or not? - DA)

   It has been suggested (26.01.2020) that this market might not be the source of this infection. To ridicule the 'suggestion' (not a claimed 'fact' - DA) that the Wuhan Institute of Virology COULD BE responsible for the pandemic, and is a simply crazed conspiracy theory, is itself absurd.

Based on what evidence could the
idea be categorically rejected?

This smacks of purpose. A hidden agenda 
 reason to divert attention away from the possibility.
It is a reasonable connection

(coincidences by definition are always suspect - DA)

The Wuhan Institue of Virology is officially acknowledged to be China's most advanced virus research lab complex. How did coronavirus 'manifest'? Where did it come from? Did it 'spontaneously' appear and mutate rapidly? It might be expected to slowly become a greater problem as any changes occurred rather than suddenly simply appear as such a virulent entity. Allegedly, it is thought to have been transmitted from animals to humans but any animal infection has been underreported (25.01.2020 - essentially, not mentioned at all. Have animals been demonised? - DA) by the media (31.01.2020). No reports are forthcoming concerning the animal population (ironically, several different species of animals (the expendables - DA) are used to test entities destined for human use (like vaccines).
   This is a virus that has only just (allegedly) made the jump from animal-to-human (where's the evidence? - DA). The strain of the virus has now been officially named SARS-CoV-2 and is claimed to have first been detected in Wuhan, Central China in December 2019. Since then, the disease it causes, COVID-19, is supposed to have killed more than 14,000 people around the world (8,000,000,000 = 0.000175%) - the link has not yet been conclusively established. This disease may just be the vehicle for other complications - a SARS-like condition. This assumes COVID-19 is exclusively responsible for those deaths. Possibly elderly people with other underlying health conditions?
   However, the virus may still be adapting as part of its shift to infecting people and interacting with the human system. It is something scientists will want to keep an eye on as it could affect how the virus is treated in the future. This report states the released figure of 5,600 laboratory confirmations is wrong (a lie? - DA) and is definitely much higher. How can such a claim be made? On what evidence? Headline sensationalism?
   Considering the accidental release/escape of the viral entity, it is entirely reasonable to wish to contain this knowledge since the damage caused to trade would be...

massive and is much more important

than any harm caused to people

by scaremongering

   It would also cover-up any (illegal) meddling with weapons of war (agents with hostile intent, Louis - DA). Did the Chinese leaders know what had escaped accidentally? The answer must be an emphatic YES, knowing the attitude of the state and this explains why the lockdown was so rapid. It could even cause a global conflict. So, is the 'explanation' of animal transfer (eating bats and snakes in China is very common - allegedly the epicentre of the outbreak has been traced to Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market) simply a cover?


Once the deliberate action to release SARS-CoV-2i is considered, everything falls into place and ALL the subsequent connections are completely logical. Other countries need not be complicit but are simply exploiting people's fears (the pandemic and deaths) to introduce new laws and Acts of Parliament (UK). A conspiracy (implies complicity) is possible but also is using the 'created pandemic' concept (all quite reasonable, Louis - DA).
   It is very mysterious how the SARS-CoV-1 strain was dormant for 10 years and re-appeared as SARS-CoV-2 (allegedly in animals in Huanan, just 15km from the Wuhan Institue of Virology. Being zoonotic does the virus not infect (other) companion animals? - DA). Bats (a flying mammal) and snakes are both vertebrates as are dogs and cats. And...


Consider a conspiracy: the only conspiracy is the
(possible - DA) connivance between nations

The last major problem to hit the entire planet was the financial crisis. Engineered? Possibly, but unnoticed - it just...


  • Consequences (11.03.2020) continue to happen (18.03.2020) as a result of the coronavirus issue which has been growing over recent weeks. What if this pandemic infection was... deliberate? Wuhan is instantly brought onto centre world-stage after remaining relatively subdued 'in the wings'.

   It's possible that the virus leaked out accidentally (or DELIBERATELY) and attempts are being made to cover up such a serious event. China has been a signatory to the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) since 1985 and had, in 1993, declared the Wuhan Institute of Biological Products (website is not secure) as one of eight biowarfare research facilities covered by the BWC. Yet, last year’s US State Department report on arms control compliance had accused...

China of working on pathogens for

military offensive purposes

   The US had concerns with respect to Chinese military-medical institutions’ toxin research and development because of the potential dual-use applications and their potential as a biological threat”.

Deliberate "Accident"

A nonsense term but not a nonsense possibility. A perfect cover to introduce planned contamination (pandemic) though claim it was actually an accident. Misdirection? Divert attention? New laws and legislation are constantly announced. Will they be repealed? Probably not but ask the question anyway - no answer should ever be expected. It would be easy to spread around the world seemingly in some random countries but otherwise predictably in those countries where people have been repatriated or simply 'come home'.

Where would you hide a tree?

In a forest

   COVID-19 is apparently not an airborne disease and can only infect someone after human-human close contact. The reason for self-isolation and the requirement for a minimum 2 metres between people.

How can a virus cause a pandemic unless

it is physically brought into a country?

   A vial containing a small amount of the virus (as a solution) could so easily be brought into any country by a saboteur and be totally undetectable. No one would be looking for it. In a public place simply contaminate a doorknob or door handle - the smear of a tiny amount of the solution. Or just brush into some unsuspecting pedestrian or commuter. Quite innocuous though with potentially deadly consequences.

'There is this Biosafety Level 4 facility in the 

Wuhan Institute of Virology

It's the first in China, and it was specifically
set up to deal with the

coronavirus(es) and SARS
 SARS is basically a
weaponised version of the 

There have been leaks before of SARS out of this facility, and indeed the only reason for these BSL-4 facilities, based on my experience (Dr. Mercola), is the research, development, testing, and stockpiling of offensive biological weapons.'

   The SARS epidemic was contained within China (originated in Guandong province) and was first detected in Yunnan (1300km from Wuhan). This and avian 'flu implicates China. Speculatively (it is not unreasonable - DA), to connect the Wuhan Institue of Virology with all these events. Almost as if the SARS epidemic was just the test to show efficacy and was escalated to a similar but more virulent entity (human infection supposedly transmitted from animals - zoonosis). Like SARS, this could easily be turned into a pandemic if handled in the right way.


(Considering the obvious 17.04.2020 - DA)